|
[May 15, 2008]
¨ù
that Thomas P. O'Brien, U.S. Attorney (Los
Angeles), faced sharp criticism from prosecutors within his
office who say he is pressuring them to file relatively
insignificant criminal cases to drive up statistics that
make the office eligible for increased federal funding?
¨ù
that the prosecutors said O'Brien's effort to
increase filings amounts to a quota system in which lawyers
face possible discipline and other career consequences if
they fail to achieve their numbers?
¨ù
that it also detracted from their traditional
mission of prosecuting complex, time-consuming cases that
local authorities are unable to pursue?
¨ù
that O'Brien acknowledged that he had set
"performance goals" to reverse years of declining
productivity in the Los Angeles office but denied that the
goals were quotas?
¨ù
that he said that his office does not and
never will have quotas for its criminal prosecutors and to
suggest that any attorney in this office must charge a
certain number of defendants each year or face discipline is
simply not true?
¨ù
that Daniel Richman, a law professor at
Columbia University and a former federal prosecutor in New
York said that quotas are controversial because they call
into question whether prosecutors are motivated by the
pursuit of justice or are merely trying to "hit a number¡±?

¨ù
that Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff signed to
a Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
with Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Yu
Myung-hwan?
¨ù
that he security
enhancements outlined in the agreement puts Korea on the
path toward visa-free travel to the U.S., and potential
designation as a VWP member as early as later this year?

¨ù
that if a traveler believes any property has
been wrongfully seized by CBP, then participation in the
administrative forfeiture process is the primary means of
challenging property seized for forfeitures?
¨ù
that to the extent there may be other avenues
to challenge the possession by CBP of a traveler¡¯s property
would depend on the facts and circumstances of that
detention?
¨ù
that information on the redress process for
seized property can be found in the CBP Informed Compliance
Publication entitled: ¡°What Every Member of the Trade
Community Should Know About: Customs Administrative
Enforcement Process: Fines, Penalties, Forfeitures and
Liquidated Damages¡± dated February 2004?

¨ù
that evidence of prior violations of
nonimmigrant status is considered in deciding if an arriving
alien is able to prove that s/he will abide by the
conditions of admission as a nonimmigrant and is done on a
case-by-case basis?
¨ù
that factors to be taken into consideration
include: the nature of the violation (e.g., working or
studying on a B-2 admission), the frequency of violation
(was it a single event or was it repeated?), the duration of
the violation (was it for a week or for six months?) and the
time elapsed since the violation occurred (did it occur ten
years ago or last year?)?
¨ù
that an alien who presents a facially valid
nonimmigrant visa but who fails to prove that s/he fits the
definition of, and will meet the conditions for, the
claimed nonimmigrant classification is inadmissible as an
immigrant without a valid immigrant visa?
¨ù
that such an alien is properly subject to
expedited removal and visa cancellation?

¨ù
that in July of
2007, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
received 460,000 applications for naturalization?
¨ù
that that was three
times the record for any previous month and that for the
year, USCIS received 1.4 million naturalization
applications, almost double the normal annual volume?
¨ù
that the USCIS is
hiring and training hundreds of additional immigration
officers to adjudicate these cases?
¨ù
that the agency is
also conducting naturalization interviews on weekends, after
normal business hours and in additional locations?

|