|
[July 15, 2007]
ASYLUM DECISIONS
¨ù
that asylum seekers in the U.S. face broad
disparities in the nation¡¯s 54 immigration courts, with the
outcome of cases influenced by thins like the location of
the court and the sex and professional background of judges?
¨ù
that a study conducted by three law professors
analyzed 140,000 cases adjudicated, for example: Colombians
had an 88 percent chance of winning asylum from one judge in
the Miami immigration court and a 5 percent chance from
another judge in the same court?
¨ù
that an author of the study, Philip G. Schrag,
a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, said ¡°It is
very disturbing that these decisions can mean life or death,
and they seem to a large extent to be the result of a
clerk¡¯s random assignment of a case to a particular judge¡±?
¨ù
that the study offers an unusually detailed
window into the overburdened and often erratic immigration
courts?
¨ù
that though the immigration bill now being
considered does not propose major revisions in asylum laws,
those courts serve as the judicial backbone of the
immigration system that would take on an immense new
workload if the bill becomes law?
¨ù
that the study by the three professors did not
examine the judges¡¯ political affiliation or the
administration that appointed them?
¨ù
that the study suggests that the different
willingness to grant asylum between male and female judges
may in part have to do with their backgrounds?
¨ù
that of 78 female judges in the study, 27
percent had previously worked for organizations that
defended the rights of immigrants or the poor, while only 8
percent of 169 male judges had similar experience?
¨ù
that though the study does not identify judges
by name, profiles of immigration judges were drawn up
separately by the Transactional Records Access
Clearinghouse, a research group at
Syracuse University?
¨ù
that one of the most significant factors
determining whether a judge would be likely to approve
asylum petitions was sex, the study found. Female
immigration judges grant asylum at a 44 percent higher rate
than their male colleagues?
¨ù
that according to the study, great differences
also prevail among judges sitting on the same court and
hearing similar asylum cases. In the Miami immigration
court, one judge granted 3 percent of the asylum cases,
while another granted 75 percent?

ARIZONA¡¯S NEW LAWS RE ILLEGAL HIRING
¨ù
that Arizona¡¯s new law imposes the stiffest
sanctions in the U.S. for hiring illegal workers?
¨ù
that Arizona leads the nation in population
growth and more illegal immigrants cross its borders?
¨ù
that in an apparent backlash, the state is
leading the change to halt illegal immigration by cracking
on employers?
¨ù
that the new law effectively sets up a
two-strike penalty for businesses wherein an employer who
hire an illegal immigrant would have its business license
suspended temporarily and a second offence would mean a
permanent revocation of the license?
¨ù
that the bigger challenge may be enforcing
such a law and it¡¯s constitutionality tested in the court?
¨ù
that the business community dubbed the measure
¡°business death penalty¡±?

NATURALIZATION FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL
¨ù
that recent changes in sections 328 and 329 of
the INA make it easier for qualified military personnel to
become U.S. citizens?
¨ù
that in addition, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) has created a streamlined
process specifically for military personnel serving on
active-duty status or recently discharged?
¨ù
that as of October 1, 2004, members of the
U.S. Armed Forces do not pay a fee when filing for
citizenship?
¨ù
that to qualify, a military service member
must meet certain requirements to become a U.S. citizen.
These include: demonstrating good moral character,
demonstrating knowledge of the English language,
demonstrating knowledge of U.S. government and history
(civics) and demonstrating attachment to the U.S. by taking
an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution?
¨ù
that military service members are exempt from
other naturalization requirements outlined in the INA as
amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2004?
¨ù
that Section 1703 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 - extension of
posthumous benefits to surviving spouses, children, and
parents - states that an
alien spouse, child, or parent of a U.S. citizen service
member of the U.S. Armed Forces who dies in combat or as a
result of combat can file for citizenship within two years
of that service member¡¯s death. For immigration purposes,
the applicant will remain an immediate relative of the
deceased service member. This status would be revoked should
the spouse remarry?
¨ù
that Section 1704 of the same act - Expedited
process for granting posthumous citizenship to members of
the armed services - states that a
service member who dies in combat or as a result of combat
may receive posthumous citizenship?
¨ù
that the service member¡¯s next of kin, the
Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary¡¯s designee with USCIS
may make this request on behalf of the service member?
¨ù
that a request for posthumous citizenship must
be made within two years of the service member¡¯s death or
within two years of the enactment of this section of the
law?
¨ù
that Section 1705 of the Act states that the
amendments made by the provisions of the Act take effect as
if enacted on September 11, 2001?
¨ù
that on July 3,
2002, President Bush signed the ¡°Expedited Naturalization
Executive Order¡± calling for the expedited naturalization of
aliens and non-citizens serving on active duty in the U.S.
Armed Forces during the War on Terrorism?
¨ù
that the
Executive Order allows active duty personnel serving on or
after September 11, 2001 to immediately file for
citizenship. Normally, a military service member would have
to complete one-year of honorable service before qualifying
to file for citizenship?
¨ù
that Section
329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the
President to waive this requirement during periods of
military hostilities.
¨ù
that the INA allows for the awarding of
posthumous citizenship to active-duty military personnel who
die while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces?
¨ù
that in addition, surviving family members
seeking immigration benefits are given special
consideration?
¡¡
|