|
[October 15, 2005]
ˇˇ
∙
that Mexicans, who accounted
for 94 percent of the U.S. Border Patrol’s 1.1 million
arrests last year, rarely go to jail - unless they are
serial offenders or have criminal histories?
∙
that typically, they are
fingerprinted and immediately sent home on a bus as
“voluntary returns?

∙
that U.S. passports are
not valid for travel to Cuba and North Korea?
∙
that U.S. citizens
returning from trips to said countries where the State
Department has imposed a travel ban will have their passport
lifted?
∙
that a special memorandum will
be sent to the Department of State containing passport data
and facts surrounding the travel?
∙
that a copy of the memorandum
will be provided to the bearer of the U.S. passport?

∙
that recent legislation
provided for the recapture of 50,000 employment-based
immigrant visa numbers that were unused in FY 2001 through
FY 2004?
∙
that such numbers are to be
made available to employment-based immigrants described in
the Department of Labor’s Schedule A and their accompanying
spouses and children?
∙
that Schedule A applies
only to professional nurses, physical therapists, and
certain aliens of exceptional ability in the sciences or
arts?
∙
that the Schedule A category
is now current, meaning that immigrant visa numbers are
available to Schedule A workers?

∙
that federal regulations
protect the confidentiality of asylum applicants?
∙
that the federal regulations
at 8 CFR 208.6 general prohibit the disclosure to third
parties of information contained in or pertaining to asylum,
credible fear determinations, and reasonable fear
determinations?

∙
that according to established
guidelines, confidentiality is breached when information
contained in or pertaining to an asylum application is
disclosed to a third party in violation of the regulations?
∙
that in the absence of the
asylum applicant’s written consent or the Secretary of
Homeland Security’s specific authorization, disclosure may
be made only to the United States government
officials or contractors and United States federal or state
courts on a need to know basis related to certain
administrative, law enforcement and civil actions?
∙
that public disclosure of
asylum-related information may subject the claimant to
retaliatory measures by government authorities or non-state
actors in the event that the claimant is repatriated, or
endanger the security of the claimant’s family members who
may still be residing in the country of origin?

∙
that under the new changes to
the L-1 visa program, L-1B ?u>specialized knowledge?
workers can no longer work primarily at a worksite other
than that of their petitioning employer if either (a) the
work is controlled and supervised by a different employer or
(b) the off-site arrangement is essentially one to provide a
non-petitioning party with local labor for hire, rather than
a service related to the specialized knowledge of the
petitioning employer?
∙
that the agency that will
interpret the “control and supervision?provisions of the
new law will require an L-1B petitioning employer to retain
ultimate authority over the worker? |